Since PW posted a great article on the conference, I won't repeat what they've covered, but I will mention the few points that stand out in my mind:
- To save costs, xml is only one of three necessary steps a publisher takes; the other two are offshoring and using standard, automated templates.
- To have xml be the most useful, you need to start with an xml-first workflow--not an xml-last one--and this means that the authors and editors need to be trained in xml tagging and taxonomy.
- The more "chunkable" and repurposable your content, the more important it is to get an xml-first workflow going.
- XML allows easier updates and synchronicity of multiple files.
- XML allows for simultaneous deliverables that can be adjusted to any medium since it is content-centric and design-agnostic.
No comments:
Post a Comment